Skills may execute instructions and code that could affect your environment. Marketplace scans reduce risk but do not guarantee safety. Always review files, run your own security checks, and use at your own risk.
Customer Research
Security Scan Summary
Status: Safe
Source: Syntic Skills registry
Automated security scan completed with no high-risk patterns detected. Manual review is still required.
About This Skill
Use when the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research — interviews, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or personas built from real data.
Downloadable SKILL.md
Download SKILL.md and place it in your Syntic skills folder. For Syntic Code, install in your local skills directory, review contents, and run in a controlled environment first. Acknowledge the risk notice above to enable the download.
--- name: Customer Research description: Use when the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research — interviews, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or personas built from real data. category: Strategy version: 2.0.0 tools: [] --- # Customer Research Uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so positioning, product, and copy are grounded in reality rather than assumption. ## Before Starting Search the Knowledge Base for existing product-marketing context first, and use it to skip questions already answered. ## Two Modes **Mode 1: Analyze existing assets** — raw research material already exists (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets); the job is extracting signal. **Mode 2: Go find research** — gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites); the job is knowing where to look and what to extract. Most engagements combine both — establish which applies before proceeding. ## Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Assets **Asset types and what to mine:** - *Interview/sales call transcripts* — pains, triggers, desired outcomes, exact language, objections, alternatives considered; specifically the moment they decided to look for a solution and what they tried before. - *Surveys* — segment by tier/use case/tenure before concluding anything; flag where open-ended answers contradict multiple-choice answers; find the 20% of responses carrying the most signal. - *Support conversations* — recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, "I wish it could…" language; categorize tickets before analyzing (bugs vs. confusion vs. missing features vs. expectation mismatch). - *Win/loss and churn notes* — for wins, what tipped the decision and what nearly lost it; for losses/churn, was it price, features, fit, or timing; segment by reason rather than averaging across causes. - *NPS* — passives and detractors carry more improvement signal than promoters; pair every score with its verbatim (a 9 with a specific complaint beats a bare 10). **Extraction framework** — for each asset, pull: (1) Jobs to Be Done — functional, emotional, and social job; (2) pain points, prioritizing unprompted ones stated with emotional language; (3) trigger events (team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, a competitor's move); (4) desired outcomes, captured as exact quotes not paraphrases; (5) language and vocabulary verbatim — "we were drowning in spreadsheets" beats "manual process inefficiency" for copy; (6) alternatives considered, including doing nothing or building in-house. **Synthesis** — cluster by theme across assets; score by frequency × intensity; segment by company size/role/use case/tenure to see if patterns differ; pull 5-10 "money quotes" per theme; flag contradictions between what customers say and do. **Quality guardrails** — label every insight's confidence: **High** (3+ independent sources, unprompted, consistent across segments), **Medium** (2 sources, or prompted, or one segment only), **Low** (single source, possible outlier). Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer. Watch for sample bias: online reviewers skew toward power users and strong opinions, support tickets skew toward problems not value, Reddit skews technical/skeptical. Don't build personas or messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment. ## Mode 2: Digital Watering-Hole Research Online communities carry unfiltered language about the problem space. Match source to ICP: **B2B SaaS/technical** — Reddit (role subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro. **SMB/founders** — r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness, Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro. **Developer/DevOps** — r/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord. **B2C/consumer** — app store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby subs, YouTube/TikTok/Instagram comments. **Enterprise** — LinkedIn, analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro. Quick routing: have a category → start with G2/Capterra reviews (own + competitors); need to know where the audience spends time → SparkToro; need raw language → Reddit/YouTube comments; need trigger events → LinkedIn posts, job postings, HN "Ask HN"; need competitive intel → competitor 4-star G2 reviews, Product Hunt discussion, SparkToro competitor audience analysis. For every piece of content found, capture: source (platform, thread URL, date), verbatim quote (never paraphrased), context (what prompted it), sentiment, theme tag (pain/trigger/outcome/alternative/language), and any profile signals (role, company size, industry). Synthesize into a per-theme block: summary, frequency (X of Y sources), intensity, 2+ representative quotes with source/date, and implications for messaging/product/positioning. ## Persona Generation Build personas from research only — never invent one with fewer than 5-10 data points from a consistent segment. Structure: profile (title range, company size, industry if narrow, reporting line, team size); primary Job to Be Done in one sentence; trigger events; top 3 pains in their words; desired outcomes and how they measure success; objections/fears; alternatives considered; key vocabulary (verbatim phrases); how to reach them (channels, content consumed, trusted communities). Anti-patterns: don't name personas cutely unless the team finds it genuinely useful; don't average across segments (a persona representing everyone represents no one); don't fill in details without data — leave them blank; revisit quarterly as the market and product evolve. ## Deliverable Formats Offer, per the user's need: a research synthesis report (themes, quotes, patterns, implications); a VOC quote bank organized by theme for copy use; a persona document (1-3 personas); a jobs-to-be-done map by segment; a competitive intelligence summary of what customers say about competitors vs. the product; or a research gap analysis. Ask which deliverable(s) are needed before generating output. ## Questions to Ask Lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed rather than asking all five at once: (1) What's the goal — messaging, personas, product gaps, churn? (2) What already exists — transcripts, surveys, tickets, reviews, nothing? (3) Who's the target segment? (4) What's the product, if not already in context? (5) What deliverable is wanted? ## Related Skills copywriting (copy informed by research), cro (optimizing with VOC insights), competitors (comparison pages), churn-prevention (churn-research-driven strategy), ads (research-informed targeting), cold-email (pain/trigger-informed outreach), content-strategy (topics from research).
Bundle Download
Includes SKILL.md and bundled support files where provided. Risk acknowledgement is required.
Install Targets
Syntic App
- 1. Create a dedicated folder for this skill in your local skills library.
- 2. Place SKILL.md into that folder.
- 3. Restart Syntic and invoke this skill on matching tasks.
Syntic Code (CLI)
- 1. Save SKILL.md in your local Syntic Code skills directory.
- 2. Keep related files in the same skill folder.
- 3. Run in a safe environment and validate outputs.
Source
https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/customer-research/SKILL.md
Open Source Link